Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1955 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $99.0 vs $209.99
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400F - $0.77 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100T - 150 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |