Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 927 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $99.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-11600KF - $0.14 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than Core i3-9100T - 803 vs 684 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
684
85.18057285180572%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3690 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
803
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
73.6842105263158%
Price, $
$150
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
54.78142076502732%
Multi-Core
3178
36.49936832433674%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |