Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 135 days older than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $99.0 vs $186.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.37 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Core i3-9100T - 272 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
271
99.63235294117648%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3841 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
54.41176470588235%
Price, $
$186
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $186 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
96.62650602409639%
Multi-Core
3178
51.98756747914282%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |