Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4330 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4330 is 272 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1610 - 227 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |