Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4330 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4330 is 363 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-3240 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75491 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
51.969981238273924%
Multi-Core
1137
53.031716417910445%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |