Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2221 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $25.7 vs $188.95
- Up to 85% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.28 vs $1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i3-3240T - 101 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 24 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
101
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
14%
Price, $
$188.95
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |