Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $25.7 vs $209.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-14400F - $0.04 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3240T - 769 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
673
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
769
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
14%
Price, $
$209.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |