Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $25.7 vs $210.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-13600K - $0.36 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 155% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-3240T - 181 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
71
39.226519337016576%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
31.03448275862069%
Price, $
$210
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
16.77298311444653%
Multi-Core
971
6.539601293103449%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |