Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - $25.7 vs $255.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3240T - 478 vs 370 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
16.641846612062547%
Multi-Core
971
6.8212153143659995%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |