Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1788 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $25.7 vs $395.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.1 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-3240T - 269 vs 255 FPS
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5300 minutes ago
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |