Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $25.7 vs $294.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-14600KF - $0.15 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-3240T - 194 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
166
85%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7986 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
9%
Price, $
$294.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7986 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |