Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $25.7 vs $267.87
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 34% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-3240T - 234 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76576 minutes ago
Buy for $267.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76577 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
21.27558305568777%
Multi-Core
971
11.04664391353811%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |