Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2054 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - $25.7 vs $140.0
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3240T - 270 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75801 minutes ago
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
38.80208333333333%
Multi-Core
971
20.057839289403017%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |