Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3964 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 67% better in Starfield than FX-6200 - 72 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $42.85 vs $138.98
- Up to 48% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-13100 - $1.0 vs $1.93 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15287 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15286 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |