Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930T - 131 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $39.0 vs $138.98
- Up to 67% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-13100 - $0.35 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-13100 - 35 vs 60 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $138.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15257 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15256 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |