Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 38% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1610 - 153 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2014 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |