Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 915 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930T - 206 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1976 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |