Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 23 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $89.97 vs $188.95
- Up to 51% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.52 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 2500X - 179 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
172
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
49%
Price, $
$188.95
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |