Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 918 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $106.47 vs $239.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-11900F - $0.84 vs $1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 5 2500X - 144 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
127
88.19444444444444%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32307 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
50.29940119760479%
Price, $
$239.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $239.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
50.806080147397516%
Multi-Core
3801
41.445861956166176%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |