Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1946 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $106.47 vs $175.81
- Up to 11% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-14400F - $0.54 vs $0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 46% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 2500X - 288 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FPS
197
68.40277777777779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $106.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31407 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
88.52459016393443%
Price, $
$175.81
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $175.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
46.93617021276596%
Multi-Core
3801
33.46245268069372%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |