Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1907 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-9600K - 245 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600K - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $145.0 vs $209.99
- Up to 22% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-14400F - $0.67 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.86/FPS
77%
Price, $
$209.99
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11569 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
216
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |