Buy on Amazon
$155
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 249 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Valorant than Ryzen 3 2200G - 811 vs 733 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $130.0 vs $155.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-9600K - $0.18 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-9600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz Turbo unlocked LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
733
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-9600K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
