Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 124 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $81.39 vs $209.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-14400F - $0.81 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
47%
Price, $
$209.99
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10765 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
101
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |