Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-10105 - 197 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $89.95 vs $209.99
- Up to 52% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-14400F - $0.51 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
197
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
47%
Price, $
$209.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11664 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$89.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11664 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |