Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7500T - 150 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $69.0 vs $209.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400F - $0.55 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12128 minutes ago
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |