Key Differences
In short — Pentium G840 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G840 is 281 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Performs up to 1% better in War Thunder than FX-6200 - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Pentium G840 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 22nd, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |