Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 470 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $24.99 vs $41.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-3240 - $0.23 vs $0.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G840 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Pentium G840 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
110
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $24.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |