Buy on Amazon
$41
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4560 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1583 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3240 - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $28.55 vs $41.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-3240 - $0.2 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3240 3.4GHz 3.40GHz 3M SR0RH Socket 1155 Ivy Bridge CPU Processor
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3453 minutes ago
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$28.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium G4560 - 3.5 GHz - 2 cores - 4 threads - 3 MB cache - LGA1151 Socket - Box
Buy for $28.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3453 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Pentium G4560
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
