Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2426 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $42.85 vs $145.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-9600K - $0.31 vs $0.74 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 42% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6200 - 196 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7202 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |