Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2331 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G550 - 137 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $49.0 vs $145.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-9600K - $0.43 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18452 minutes ago
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18451 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600K | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |