Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2378 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $42.85 vs $145.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-9100 - $0.26 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6200 - 187 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13103 minutes ago
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |