Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2098 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 131 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - $37.0 vs $107.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $107 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74537 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74535 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
30.891950688905002%
Multi-Core
739
20.544898526549904%
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |