Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7300 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7300 is 1772 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $42.85 vs $129.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-7300 - $0.3 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than FX-6200 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3585 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-7300 4GHz Skylake CPU LGA1151 Desktop Smart Cache Boxed
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i3-7300
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
