Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K and the more expensive Core i3-7300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-7300 - 535 vs 528 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-7300 - $51.6 vs $129.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-7300 - $0.1 vs $0.24 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3600 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
535
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3600 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |