Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2589 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8300 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 95 vs 280 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |