Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 771 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G6900 - 147 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |