Buy on Amazon
€70.69
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1399
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 771 days older than Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G6900 - 136 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Celeron® G6900, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop
Buy for €70.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
96.16076784643072%
Multi-Core
2696
20.24479987985282%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
