Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2034 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4150 - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €33.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17394 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |