Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than FX-6300 - 226 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-6300 - €0.18 vs €0.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - €38.99 vs €39.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |