Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3250 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3250 is 636 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 2% cheaper than Pentium G3250 - €38.99 vs €39.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 12% better in League of Legends than FX-6300 - 65 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 9% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-6300 - €0.61 vs €0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |