Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 8% better in Hogwarts Legacy than FX-6300 - 83 vs 77 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-6300 - €24.0 vs €49.68
- Up to 55% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than FX-6300 - €0.29 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
77
92.7710843373494%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
44.61538461538461%
Price, €
€49.68
48%
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
83
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |