Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 970 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-2320 - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2320 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2320
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - €25.19 vs €39.9
- Up to 35% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4150 - €0.15 vs €0.23 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
167
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-2320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |