Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Core i3-4150 - 204 vs 179 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €19.0 vs €78.7
- Up to 72% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G6900 - €0.11 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |