Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-760 - 211 vs 188 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 75% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €19.99 vs €78.7
- Up to 70% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G6900 - €0.11 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
188
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |