Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-4100 - 183 vs 178 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 63% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €22.88 vs €61.99
- Up to 62% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G6900 - €0.13 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €61.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3402 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |