Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3220 outperforms the more expensive FX-4100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3220 is 327 days newer than the more expensive FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-4100 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-4100 - €18.25 vs €22.88
- Up to 17% better value when playing Valheim than FX-4100 - €0.1 vs €0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17029 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.25
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17029 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |