Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 5 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 15% better in New World than Athlon 3000G - 121 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 48 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
105
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |