Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium Gold G6405 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 482 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Pentium Gold G6405 - 166 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 35 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 13% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €71.5 vs €82.24
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - €0.44 vs €0.5 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13363 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13362 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Athlon | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |