Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 953 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Athlon 3000G - 268 vs 266 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €74.94 vs €82.24
- Up to 10% better value when playing F1 22 than Athlon 3000G - €0.28 vs €0.31 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13341 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Picasso | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |