Buy on Amazon
€74.44
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1541 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 241 vs 227 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 18% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €60.9 vs €74.44
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD Athlon 3000G Processore con grafica Radeon Vega 3 (2C/4T, orologio base da 3,5 GHz)
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74112 minutes ago
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
60.71055381400209%
Multi-Core
992
50.22784810126583%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
