Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1610 - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €60.9 vs €72.66
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74367 minutes ago
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74367 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
73.32185886402753%
Multi-Core
739
74.49596774193549%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |