Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1610 - 92 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €60.9 vs €88.88
- Up to 33% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1610 - €0.66 vs €0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
92
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16693 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
