Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G3900 vs Celeron G1610

Celeron G3900 vs Celeron G1610: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1002 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1610 - 158 vs 155 FPS
  • Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €60.9 vs €72.66
  • Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 51 vs 55 Watts
This is a free version of Resident Evil 4.
Resident Evil 4

Resident Evil 4

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Max

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

158

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€60.9

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray

Buy for 60.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 74367 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

155

98.10126582278481%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

€72.66

83%

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Max

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

100%

Intel Celeron G1610 Logo
Celeron G1610

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

426

73.32185886402753%

Multi-Core

739

74.49596774193549%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

vs
Intel Celeron G1610 Logo

Intel Celeron G1610

Sep 1st, 2015
Release DateDec 3rd, 2012
CeleronCollectionCeleron
SkylakeCodenameIvy Bridge
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
2Threads2
2.8 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.6 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
51 W
TDP55 W
14 nm
Process Size22 nm
28.0x
Multiplier26.0x
Intel HD 510Integrated GraphicsIntel HD
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.